Skip to main content

Boss is an a**

or something like that if one were to name the feelings of a lot of people working in organizations and who have a boss on top of them.

Organizations can't be termed bad; at best they are only a structure, a framework. We know they are the people who make us feel one way or another.

In fact, life becomes heaven or hell depending on your equation with the person you are working under/with.

The 'boss is an a**' problem arises when:
  • the boss or the subordinate, does not have talent (or thinks that the other doesn't have talent)
  • the boss or the subordinate, does not have skills (or thinks that the other doesn't have skills)
  • the boss or the subordinate, does not know how to communicate (or thinks that the other doesn't know how to communicate)
For those who've had bosses know bosses aren't any better. Nor are they any better who think that bosses aren't any better! 

Does the boss deserve the subordinate? Does the subordinate deserve the boss? How does this frequent mismatch be avoided/resolved?

The french origin of the word 'interview' is 'entrevue', verbal noun from s'entrevoir "to see each other, visit each other briefly, have a glimpse of." Unfortunately, we are so far down the road that to make organizations re-evaluate the meaning of 'interview' could be an exercise like diving into a pitless bottom.

So now? 

Here's a suggestion, a possible solution: 

When an organization posts an ad to recruit a 'passionate' employee, it would also give a measure of the passion of the person who's gonna be the boss of this employee.

When it posts an ad to recruit a 'creative' person, it would also give a measure of the creativity of the person who's gonna be the boss of this person.

When an organization posts an ad to recruit a man with 'sound communication skills', it would also give an idea of the soundness of the communication skills of the one who is going to boss around. 

Basically, it's the boss description that matters more. Job description is a necessary condition. But boss description is the decisive condition.

Do this and the number of applications might decline. But there's every likelihood that relevant applications might fly in.

Gives me an idea to develop an online app! Hurry!

Popular posts from this blog

Afghani Nuskha, Sex, Nudity & Beer

Yes, these've garnered greatest eyeballs on my blog. I'm sure all who've landed on my blog searching for these were lured by the headlines and disappointed by the content ;). An experiment of sorts, it's got good result. Let me call this the short-term dynamics and the dominance of 'baser' instincts. Rest you can infer.

Have a great Monday!

Afghani Nuskha & Japani Tel

Today's Rajasthan Patrika, last page, premium spots :). Mumbai's local trains also carry similar things...

David Damron on filling time

Just a few moments back I read this guest post by David Damron (of The Minimalist Path) on ZenHabits. Fantastic read. Simple to apply and see the result for yourself. So, am publishing the same post here. Spread the message far and wide (for it is mighty important) :).

In the post below, forget the word Materialism. It isn't such a 'spiritual' lesson after all; though it could be if you want to take it that way. My point is it might just help you to set some worthy goals for yourself.


Cutting the Cord to Materialism
Let’s start with an exercise … Grab a small sheet of paper and a pen or pencil.After you read the following question, please take 5 deep breaths before answering.Write your response to the up-coming question on your piece of paper in one sentence.Here is your question to answer:

If you had the opportunity to do one activity for one week without any worry about finances, cost, or other outside commitments, what would you love to do for this week?

I hope you …